When technology projects fail, who owns the code?

Use an agreement to define who owns what and who pays when things go wrong

Software development, IT procurement, SaaS

Technology contracts for every commercial arrangement

Built for the way technology actually works.

EAGLEGATE. Commercial technology law.

Technology Contracts Lawyers Brisbane

Technology contracts define deliverables, ownership, risk, and what happens when a project goes wrong. EAGLEGATE advises technology companies, software providers and businesses on technology agreements, IT contracts and commercial technology transactions across Brisbane and Queensland.

Technology contracts present commercial and legal complexity that standard commercial agreements do not anticipate. IP ownership, acceptance testing, service levels, data handling, and what happens when a project fails or a vendor relationship breaks down all require specific, technically informed drafting. A technology contract that treats software development like any other service engagement is a contract waiting to create a dispute. EAGLEGATE advises technology companies, software providers, and businesses procuring technology on drafting, negotiating, and enforcing technology agreements.

Nicole Murdoch’s background in engineering and IT gives EAGLEGATE genuine technical understanding of what technology contracts are actually regulating — not just their legal form. This matters when the contract needs to be drafted with precision about what constitutes a deliverable, what acceptance means, and who owns the result.

Technology projects fail on contracts, not code. The agreement determines who bears the risk when they do.

Our Expertise

Key Technology Contracts Expertise — Draft, Negotiate, Enforce

EAGLEGATE advises on technology contracts across every type of commercial arrangement.

Software Development Agreements

A software development agreement must address: scope of work and deliverables; acceptance testing criteria and procedures; payment milestones tied to deliverables rather than time; IP ownership and assignment; source code escrow arrangements; and what happens if the project is terminated mid-development. Without precise drafting on each of these, every ambiguity becomes a dispute trigger. IP ownership is particularly critical — under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), copyright generally vests in the author as creator, but where a work is made by an employee in the course of their employment the employer owns it; an independent contractor retains ownership unless it is expressly assigned.

IT Procurement and Outsourcing

Enterprise IT procurement involves service level agreements, data handling obligations under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), change management processes, termination for convenience and for cause, and exit obligations. EAGLEGATE advises both buyers and suppliers of IT services on contracts that reflect the actual commercial arrangement and allocate risk appropriately.

SaaS and Subscription Agreements

SaaS agreements must address: subscription terms and pricing; data ownership and portability; uptime commitments and service level credits (and SLAs); data handling and Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) compliance; IP ownership of customer data and improvements; and termination and data return obligations. EAGLEGATE drafts and reviews SaaS agreements for both providers and enterprise customers.

AI Governance and Technology Agreements

AI-related technology contracts raise specific questions about ownership of AI-generated outputs, training data rights, model transparency, liability for AI errors, and compliance with emerging regulatory frameworks. EAGLEGATE advises on AI technology agreements and governance arrangements as the regulatory landscape in Australia continues to develop.

Technology Contract Disputes

Where a technology contract gives rise to a dispute — failed project delivery, IP ownership conflict, service level failure, or a breach of the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) — EAGLEGATE advises on the dispute and conducts litigation where required.

Our Approach

1. Understand the Technical Context

We understand what the technology arrangement is actually doing — what the deliverables are, how they are built, and what the acceptance criteria should look like — before we draft the legal framework. Our founding Director practised in IT before moving to the law, and applies that technical background directly to your matter.

2. Allocate Risk Correctly

We identify where risk lies — performance risk, IP risk, data risk, regulatory risk — and draft contract terms that allocate each risk to the party best positioned to manage it.

3. Draft and Negotiate

We draft or review the contract documents and negotiate with the counterparty’s legal team. Our objective is a contract both parties are willing to sign — one that protects the client’s rights and specific position without derailing the commercial outcome.

4. Manage Disputes

Where a technology contract dispute arises, we advise on the contract interpretation, the available remedies, and the most commercially efficient path to resolution.

Why Choose EAGLEGATE

Technical Credibility

Nicole Murdoch’s engineering and IT background means EAGLEGATE understands what technology contracts are regulating — not just their legal structure. This matters in disputes and in drafting.

Both Sides of Technology Transactions

EAGLEGATE advises technology suppliers and technology buyers. This bilateral perspective informs more effective advice for each.

Disputes Capability

Technology contract disputes require lawyers who understand both the commercial technology context and the litigation process. EAGLEGATE combines both.

Brisbane & Queensland

We advise technology businesses across Brisbane, Queensland, and nationally.

Our Insights

Book a Consultation

Book a 30‑minute confidential consultation.

Book a Consultation

Technology projects need contracts built for how technology works.

Book a Consultation